Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26101 (PNJ)

SUPREETA v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/18473/2026 · 2026-07-06

Harpreet Singh Brar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

121 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18473-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 06.07.2026 Supreeta ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Dixit Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Nain, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Shubham Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.3. HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral) Prayer in this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondent No.3 to allow the petitioner to inspect her evaluated answer booklet for the subject knowledge test held on 22.03.2026 for the post of Assistant Professor (Psychology) against advertisement No.63/2024 (Annexure P-1) and to direct the respondent No.2 to decide the representation/application dated 14.05.2026 (Annexure P-5) submitted by the petitioner. At the outset, learned counsel for respondent No.3 submits that the representation/application dated 14.05.2026 (Annexure P-5) has already been considered and decided by passing a speaking order rejecting the claim of the petitioner. MOHD YAKUB 2026.07.06 16:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh. CWP-18473-2026 (O&M) -2- In view of the same, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to challenge the speaking order, if so advised. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 06.07.2026 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MOHD YAKUB 2026.07.06 16:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.