Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26096 (JHR)

KAILASH DAS @ KAILOSH DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8222/2026 · 2026-09-15

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:27827 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8222 of 2026 Kailash Das @ Kailosh Das, Aged about 23 years, Son of Jayram Das, Resident of Jhunaki, P.O & P.S.-Pathardah, District Deoghar. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Spl.P.P. 03/15.09.2026 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 19.05.2026 in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 75 of 2026, for the alleged offence registered under Sections 111 (2) (b), 111(3), 111(4), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2)/3(5) of the B.N.S. 2023 and Sections 66(B), 66 (C), 66(D) and 84 (C) of the Information Technology Amendment Act, 2008, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II cum Special Judge Cyber-Crime Cases, Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that charge sheet has already been submitted. The petitioner having no criminal antecedent. It has been submitted that 2 mobile and 1 SIM card are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He has also submitted that 2 crime links have been found during investigation and 2 victims have been identified. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner are not in dispute. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and the charge sheet having been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty 2026:JHHC:27827 2 five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II cum Special Judge Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 75 of 2026 on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 6. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 15.09.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-16.09.2026