Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26095 (KAR)

MR. S HANUMANTHEGOWDA v. MR. HANUMAANTHARAYAPPA

WP/18471/2026 · 2026-06-22

Lalitha Kanneganti

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30642 WP No. 18471 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 18471 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: MR. S. HANUMANTHEGOWDA S/O MR. SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT: OBLAPURA VILLAGE THYMAGONDLU HOBLI NELAMANGALA TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NISHANTH A.V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR. HANUMAANTHARAYAPPA S/O LATE CHIKKANAGAIAH AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS R/AT 13TH CROSS ROAD HAVANURU BADAVANE NAGASANDRA POST BANGALORE-560073. 2. MS. UMA W/O LATE K. RAMIAH AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS 3. MS. R. JYOTHI D/O LATE K. RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS 4. MS. R. ANUJA Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30642 WP No. 18471 of 2026 D/O LATE K. RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS 5. MR. NAGESH S/O LATE K. RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS 6. MS. PRIYANKA W/O NAGESH AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS 7. MS. NAGAMMA W/O ERANAGAIAH AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS 8. MR. DANANJAYA S/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS RESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 8 ARE R/AT: GIRIYANAPALYA VILLAGE SOMPURA HOBLI NELAMANGALA TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562111. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 01.06.2026 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NELAMANGALA IN O.S.NO.100/2026 ON IA NO.II VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ALLOW THE APPLICATION BEARING IA NO.II FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.8 DATED 02.04.2026 UNDER ORDER VII RULE 10 READ WITH SECTION 6 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 VIDE ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30642 WP No. 18471 of 2026 ORAL ORDER The office has raised an objection with regard to maintainability of the Writ Petition. 2. A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioners seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to file a Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 of CPC. 3. The memo is taken on record. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn giving liberty to avail the appropriate remedy. 5. Pending I.As., if any, shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE Vmb List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30