Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26093 (AP)

K.H.R.V.B. Anand v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/29518/2018 · 2026-03-09

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010603402018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 29518/2018 Between: 1. K.H.R.V.B. ANAND, S/O LATE SURYA PRAKASH RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O 49-54- 9/3A, BALAYYASASTRY LAYOUT, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, STAMPS AND REGISTRATION DEPT., SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUB REGISTRAR, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order, direction especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in not entertaining the sale deed presented by the petitioner in respect of premises bearing No.9-42- 19/1 admeasuring 559.80 sq. yards in Sy.No.62/2, situated at Balaji Nagar, Near Siripuram Junction, Visakhapatnam is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to provisions of Registration Act and the Rules made there under, consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to register the sale deed in respect of premises bearing No.9-42-19/1 admeasuring 2 559.80 sq. yards in Sy.No.62/2, situated at Balaji Nagar, Near Siripuram Junction, Visakhapatnam. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent to receive the document and register the sale deed in respect of the premises bearing No.9-42-19/1 admeasuring 559.80 sq. yards in Sy.No.62/2, situated at Balaji Nagar, Near Siripuram Junction, Visakhapatnam pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH RAVINDER Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following 3 ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration and the matter has become infructuous. Recording the aforesaid submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date:10.03.2026 DSH