Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26084 (HP)

RAMESH AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER

CWP/17755/2026 · 2026-10-07

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 17748/2026 Decided on: 07.10.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CWP No. 17748/2026 Laiq Ram Sharma & Ors. …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and Anr. .....Respondents 2. CWP No. 17752/2026 Ram Partap …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Anr. .....Respondents 3. CWP No. 17754/2026 Siddharth Chauhan & Anr. …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and Anr. .....Respondents 4. CWP No. 17755/2026 Ramesh & Ors. …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and Anr. .....Respondents 5. CWP No. 17873/2026 Man Chand & Ors. …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and Anr. .....Respondents 6. CWP No. 17751/2026 2 Ravinder Kumar Sharma …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Anr. .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioners seek applicability of Jogi Ram Bhardwaj Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2 It is, however, seen from the record that the petitioners have not preferred their representations for the redressal of their grievances raised in these writ petitions. 3. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be preferring their respective representations within two weeks from today. In case such representations are so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment within a period of six weeks 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 CWP No. 2503/2024 decided on 04.06.2025 3 thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioners. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 07.10.2026 Judge rohit