APHC010588152018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 27984/2018 Between: 1. NETHALA NAGARAJU, S/O NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, RIO SARVASIDHI, S-RAYAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, S-RAYAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring action of the 2nd respondent in not conducting the survey and fixing the boundaries for the land of the petitioner situated at Sy.No.83 to an extent of Ac.1.00 cents of Sarvasiddhi Village pursuant to F.Challan No.DERO11701003733 dated 17.5.2017 is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to conduct survey and fix the boundaries for the land of the petitioner situated at Sy.No.83 to an extent of Ac.1.00 cents of Sarvasiddhi Village and pass 2 JS, J W.P.No.27984/2018 IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to conduct survey and fix the boundaries for the land of the petitioner situated at Sy.No.83 to an extent of Ac.1.00 cents of Sarvasiddhi Village pending disposal of writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V N NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3 JS, J W.P.No.27984/2018 The Court made the following ORDER: Sri.D.Prasad Kumar, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 04.02.2026 rsd 4 JS, J W.P.No.27984/2018 31 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 27984/2018 Date: 04.02.2026 rsd