RC,J CRP No.11 of 2025 1 APHC010599502024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 11/2025 Between: 1. BATHALAPALLI PULLAIAH, S/O. LATE RAMAIAH,AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O.ARAVA BRAHMIN STREET,VENKATAGIRI TOWN, TIRUPATI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. GURASALA SANJEEVAIAH, S/O. NARASIMHULU, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O. AMAMDURU VILLAGE, YERPEDU MANDAL TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 2. THE MANDAL EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, YERPEDU MANDAL, YERPEDU, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. (THE PRO-FORMA RESPONDENT/ DEFENDANT HAS NO RELIEF TO SOUGHT AGAINST IT). ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased to Aggrieved by the order and decreetal order dated 11.12.2024 in I.A. No. 646/2024 in O.S. No. 33/2024 on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, / Venkatagiri, IA NO: 1 OF 2025 RC,J CRP No.11 of 2025 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 1st respondent/defendant to furnish the security or direct the proforma respondent/2nd respondent to attach the leave salary or available amount of 1st defendant, pending disposal of the CRP and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M RAVINDRA ORDER This Civil Revision Petition is filed questioning the legality and correctness of the orders dated 11.12.2024 passed in I.A.No.646 of 2024 in O.S.No.33 of 2024 by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Venkatagiri. 2. No representation for the petitioner. 3. The Case Status Information relating to O.S.No.33 of 2024 on the file of the Court of the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Venkatagiri placed on record by the Registry shows that the said suit was dismissed as not pressed on 11.04.2025, on the memo filed by the plaintiff that the matter has been settled outside the court. 4. Since the suit was dismissed as not pressed, this Civil Revision Petition filed questioning the orders passed in an interlocutory application in the said suit becomes infructuous. RC,J CRP No.11 of 2025 3 5. Therefore, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 24TH February, 2026 RR