R/CR.MA/18947/2026 ORDER DATED: 14/08/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - BEFORE CHARGESHEET) NO. 18947 of 2026 ========================================================== SUNILKUMAR S/O SHANKARBHAI NATUBHAI PATEL Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ========================================================== Appearance: MR PRAMODKUMAR C GEHLOT(13266) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR KANVA ANTANI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR Date : 14/08/2026 ORDER [1.0] RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State. [2.0] The present application is led under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11200011260533 of 2026 registered with Valsad Rural Police Station, Dist. Valsad, for the o.ence under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)B and 29 of NDPS Act. [3.0] Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the o.ence. Investigation is almost over. Allegation against the applicant is that, at the behest of the applicant, alleged contraband was supplied by the co-accused. It is submitted that, nothing is recovered from the conscious possession of the applicant. He has no past antecedent. He therefore submits that, considering the nature of the o.ence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions. [4.0] Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed the present application and submitted that, the applicant is facing serious charges and involved in tra4cking of narcotic Ganja. Considering the gravity of o.ence, application does not deserve any consideration. [5.0] While granting bail, the Court has to consider the involvement of the R/CR.MA/18947/2026 ORDER DATED: 14/08/2026 accused in the alleged o.ence, the jurisdiction to grant bail has to be exercised on the basis of the well settled principles having regard to the facts and circumstances of each case and the following factors are to be taken into consideration while considering an application for bail: (i) the nature of accusation and the severity of the punishment and the nature of the materials relied upon by the prosecution; (ii) reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witnesses and threat to the complainant or the witnesses; (iii) reasonable possibility of securing the presence of the accused at the time of trial or the likelihood of his abscondence; (iv) character behaviour and standing of the accused and the circumstances which are peculiar to the accused; (v) larger interest of the public or the State and similar other considerations are required to be considered. [6.0] I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the investigation papers. Following aspects have been considered: (1) Investigation is almost over ; (2) Applicant is behind the bar since 28.07.2026; (3) There is nothing to be recovered or discovered from the applicant; (4) There is no possibility to conclude the trial in near future. (5) No past antecedent. (6) Allegation against the applicant is that, at the behest of the applicant, contraband Ganja was supplied by the co-accused. Nothing is found from conscious possession of the applicant. (7) Recovered quantity found from co-accused is not commercial quantity and therefore, rigors of Section 37 would not be applicable. (8) Co-accused from whose possession contraband Ganja was found is enlarged on bail by this Court and therefore, on the ground of parity also (Rameshbhai Batubhai Dhabi Vs. State of Gujarat reported in 2011(3) GLR 1999), present application deserves consideration. [7.0] This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the R/CR.MA/18947/2026 ORDER DATED: 14/08/2026 Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra vs. Central Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012]1 SCC 40 as well as in the case of Gudikanti Narasimhulu And Ors vs. Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in (1978)1 SCC 240. Obviously, the conclusion of trial will take time and keeping the accused behind the bars is nothing but amounts to pre-trial conviction and therefore, considering the celebrated principle of bail jurisprudence is that “bail is a rule and jail is exception” as well as the concept of personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, present application deserves consideration. [8.0] In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a t case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11200011260533 of 2026 registered with Valsad Rural Police Station, Dist. Valsad on executing a personal bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty ve thousand) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall; (a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty; (b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution & shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and shall not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police; (c) surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week; (d) not to leave India till trial is over, without prior permission of the Trial Court concerned; (e) mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in a week till ling of the chargesheet and after ling of the chargesheet, mark presence before the concerned police station once in a month for a period of six months; R/CR.MA/18947/2026 ORDER DATED: 14/08/2026 (f) furnish the Aadhar card, email ID/present address of his residence to the Investigating O4cer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence/contact number, SIM number without prior permission of Trial Court; (g) if the applicant is found to be indulged in any illegal activities in future, the trial Court concerned will be free to issue warrant and cancel the bail granted to the applicant. [9.0] The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other o.ence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter. [10.0] Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law. [11.0] At the trial, the trial Court shall not be inHuenced by the observations of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail. [12.0] Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted. (HASMUKH D. SUTHAR,J) SUCHIT Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: PATEL SUCHIT JAYESHBHAI(HC01083), Private Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 14/08/2026 15:59:40