Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26062 (AP)

S. Uday Kumar v. Sri Peeyush Kumar

CC/3531/2025 · 2026-02-25

Subba Reddy Satti

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010605402025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3531/2025 Between: 1. S. UDAY KUMAR,, S/O.S.VIJAY RAMA RAO, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/O.H.NO.1-13, KURUKUNDA VILLAGE, ATMAKUR MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. SRI MOWA TIRUMALA KRISHNA BABU, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF ROADS AND BUILDINGS, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. SRI L SRINIVASA REDDY, ANDHRA PRADESH ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (APRDC), R AND B DEPARTMENT, REP. BY ITS CHIEF ENGINEER( RAND B), STATE HIGHWAYS AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, AP STATE HOD BUILDING, BANDAR ROAD, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT 4. SRI C VIJAY BHASKAR REDDY, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, (RAND B), APRDC DIVISION, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may p. 2 be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents/Contemnors herein for their willful violation and deliberate disobedience of the orders passed by this Honhle Court in WP No. 20251 of 2024 dated 25.03.2025 under sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K NAGA PHANINDRA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. Y BALAJI The Court made the following: ::ORDER:: The above contempt case is filed complaining of violation of order dated 25.03.2025 in W.P.No.20251 of 2024. Today, when the matter is taken up, Sri R.V. Shiva Teja Reddy, learned counsel, representing Sri K. Naga Phanindra, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order dated 25.03.2025, has been complied with. Recording the above submission, this contempt case is dismissed. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Dated: 26.02.2026 IKN