MANJU DEVI ALIAS MANJU PRASAD v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
WPC/7297/2026 · 2026-09-15
Sri Ananda Sen
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26056 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26056 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:27751 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P(C) No. 7297 of 2026
Manju Devi @ Manju Prasad, W/o Sri Sahadev Paswan @ Sahadev Prasad, R/o Qtr No.L- 536, Saharpura, Sindri, PO & PS Sindri, Distt Dhanbad
.... Petitioner(s).
Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.The Secretary, Department of Revenue, Registration and Land Reforms, Government of Jharkhand 3.The Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad 4.The Circle Officer, Baliapur, Dhanbad
… Respondent(s).
……
CORAM :
SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanddip Barnwal, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Suraj Prakash, AC to SC-VII
…......
02/ 15.09.2026: Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
2. Petitioner wants to make necessary correction in the cause title, so far as it relates to the details of respondent No.4.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inadvertently respondent No.4- Circle Officer, Dhanbad has been made a party in place of respondent No.4- “Circle Officer, Baliapur”.
4. Necessary correction be carried out by the petitioner in course of the day in red ink.
5. It is grievance of the petitioner that inspite of the fact that in the Online Register-II, the name of the petitioner appears in respect of land of Khata No.138, Plot No.719, Area 10 Decimals, New Khata No.596, Plot No.844, Area 7 Decimals and Plot No.847 Area 3 Decimals total area 10 decimals, which is situated at Mouza Dhokhara, Mouza No.42, Anchal Baliapur, District Dhanbad, but the respondents are not receiving rent nor issuing rent receipts.
6. Considering the said submission, I direct the petitioner to
approach the Circle Officer, Baliapur, who in turn after going through the records and after hearing the parties, will pass an appropriate
order.
7. If it is found that there is no title dispute and the petitioner is title holder of the land in question, the rent should be accepted from the petitioner and rent receipts be issued.
8. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) 15th September, 2026 R.S./ Uploaded on 17/09/2026.