BABLU KUMAR RAM @ BHATIYA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./8611/2026 · 2026-09-16
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26055 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26055 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:27977 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.8611 of 2026
------ Bablu Kumar Ram @ Bhatiya, aged about 35 years, S/o Late Raju Ram, R/o Sector 4, Jhopari, P.O. & P.S.-Sector 4, District Bokaro, Jharkhand.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Baibhaw Gahlaut, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Santosh Kr. Shukla, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 16-09-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Chadrapura P.S. Case No. 137 of 2023 corresponding to G.R. Case No.1146 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 457 & 380 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed theft in the house of the informant by breaking the lock of the main gate of the house and took away the ornaments of the informant after breaking the almirah also. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused Ritik Kumar and Rahul Kumar. It is next submitted that charge has been framed but no witness has been examined in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 27.04.2026 as mentioned in para-12 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that no incriminating article has been recovered from the petitioner. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM, Bermo at Tenughat in connection with Chadrapura P.S. Case No. 137 of 2023 corresponding to G.R. Case No.1146 of 2023 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 16/09/2026 Abhiraj/