Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26042 (KAR)

SRI. NAGAPPA GOOLI v. M/S. UNIQUE DETECTIVE AND SECURITY SERVICES PVT. LTD.

MFA/4616/2020 · 2026-06-30

Pradeep Singh Yerur

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32289 MFA No. 4616 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4616 OF 2020 (CPC) BETWEEN: SRI NAGAPPA GOOLI S/O. SHRI RUDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 88 YEARS EMPLOYEE NO.6453 WORKING AS SECURITY GUARD M/S. BOSCH LTD. (FORMERLY CALLED AS MICO) NAGANATHAPURA PLANT ELECTRONIC CITY POST BANGALORE - 560 010 R/AT NO.115-1, PARAPANA AGRAHARA OPP. ANJANEYA TEMPLE PARAPANA AGRAHARA ELECTRONICS CITY BENGALURU - 560 100. …APPELLANT (BY SMT. MAITREYI KRISHNAN, ADVOCATE AND SRI CLIFTON D'ROZARIO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S. UNIQUE DETECTIVE AND SECURITY SERVICES PVT. LTD. NO. 81/A, 2ND CROSS GKW LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR BENGALURU - 560 040 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER (HUMAN RIGHTS AND ADMINISTRATION) M/S. UNIQUE DETECTIVE AND Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32289 MFA No. 4616 of 2020 SECURITY SERVICES PVT. LTD., NO.81/A, 2ND CROSS GKW LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR BENGALURU - 560 040. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI PRASHANTH B.K., ADVOCATE FO R1 AND R2) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLIII RULE 1(R) OF CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 09.10.2020 PASSED ON IA.NO.I IN O.S.NO.2744/2020 BY XXXVIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY AND ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED SEEKING TEMPORARY INJUNCTION RESTRAINING THE DEFENDANTS FROM ACTING ON THE BASIS OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 09.06.2020 TRANSFERRING THE APPELLANT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT-DEFENDANT DURING THE PENDENCY OF THE SUIT BY DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO PAY THE COSTS OF THIS APPEAL. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for appellant and learned counsel for respondents are present. 2. Learned counsel for appellant has filed a memo, which reads as under: "The Counsel for the Respondent most respectfully submits that during the pendency of the above Appeal, the Appellant has passed away. Subsequently, the wife and the child of the Appellant have approached the Respondent and have entered into a settlement by taking - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32289 MFA No. 4616 of 2020 lump sum amount. A copy of the Death Certificate of the Appellant and copy of the settlement is herewith produced as ANNEXURE A and B respectively for the kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court. So, in view of the said settlement, this Appeal has become infructuous and the same may be disposed of as settled. WHEREFORE, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to take this memo on record and dispose of the above Appeal in the interest of justice and equity.” 3. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the legal representatives of the deceased appellant have entered into a settlement agreement with the respondents and have resolved the dispute amicably. 4. The said memo and the submissions made by the learned counsels for the parties are taken on record. In view of the settlement between the parties, the appeal stands disposed off. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE CPN\List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28