AMANDEEP KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB, THROUGH HOME SECRETARY
CWP/19866/2026 · 2026-07-06
Namit Kumar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26037 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26037 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 CWP-19866 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19866 of 2026 Date of decision: 06.07.2026 Amandeep Kaur
….Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others
….Respondents
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: Mr. Gaurav Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rohit Ahuja, DAG, Punjab.
NAMIT KUMAR
, J. (ORAL)
1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing the order dated 02.02.2026 (Annexure P-3), passed by respondent No.2 and chargesheet dated 18.03.2026 (Annexure P-4), passed by respondent No.3, directing initiation of the departmental proceedings against the petitioner and for keeping the said departmental proceedings in abeyance during the pendency of the criminal trial arising out of FIR No.346 dated 01.08.2025 registered under Sections 306, 317(2), 331(4), 238 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Police Station City Barnala, District Barnala, as the criminal case and the RAVINDER SINGH 2026.07.06 18:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
2 CWP-19866 of 2026 proposed departmental proceedings are founded upon identical and similar set of facts and allegations against the petitioner.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action with better particulars.
3. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 06.07.2026
(NAMIT KUMAR) R.S.
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2026.07.06 18:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment