APHC010597622025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3417/2025 Between: 1. KOMMARI SRINIVASULU, S/O KRISHNA, AGE 36YEARS AGRICULTURAIST, R/O D.NO 3-169-E-11 ,GAJJALAKUNTA, N.G.PALLI, MADANAPALLE MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. CHALLA KALYANI, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MADANAPALLE, MADANAPALLE MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 2. K KISHORE KUMAR REDDY, S/O NOT KNOWN, TASILDAR,MADANAPALLE, MADANAPALLE MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to summon and punish the respondents/contemnors under section 10 and 12 of the Contempts of Court Act, 1971 r/w article 217 of Constitution of India for wilful violation and isobedience of the Orders of this Honble Court dt.25-09- 2025 passed in W.P No.26139 of 2025 and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased 2 may be pleased to dispense with filing of the original copy of the order passed by the 2nd Respondent/Contemnor vide Mc.No.--/2025 dt.14-10-2025 before this Hon'ble Court and pass such IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to suspend the consequential order passed by the 2nd respondent contemnor vide M.C.No.-- /2025 dt.14-10- 2025 as illegal, arbitrary', capricious and the same is in violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court. Consequently set aside the same as unsustainable under law and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N A RAMACHANDRA MURTHY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. BH RAMA KRISHNA NAIK The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.3417 of 2025 ORDER: The contempt petitioner filed W.P.No.26139 of 2025, seeking to direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the land admeasuring Ac.2.14 cents in Sy.No.599/4 of Kollabayalu Village, Madanapalle Mandal, Annamayya District, without following due process of law. 2. This Court, acceding the request of the petitioner, disposed of the writ petition vide order dated 25.09.2025, directing the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner without following due process of law. 3. Now, the contempt case came to be filed asserting that the respondent authorities had violated the orders of this Court dated 25.09.2025. However, in the entire affidavit, nowhere it indicates any specific violation of the order of this Court. 4. On perusal of the affidavit filed in support of the contempt case, it appears that the respondent authorities have initiated criminal case against the petitioner. In order to threaten the respondent authorities, the present contempt case is filed. 5. As nothing is stated with regard to violation of the order of this Court, I see no reasons to punish the respondents/contemnors under Section 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act,1971. Infact, the present contempt case is filed only to threaten the official respondents. Therefore, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 05.03.2026 KBN 4 33 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Contempt Case No.3417 of 2025 05.03.2026 KKBBNN