112 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-2953-2026 Date of Decision: July 06, 2026 Surjit Kaur and others …Pe00oners Versus Lakhvinder Singh and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Arun Bansal and Mr. Naveen Lohiya, Advocates for the peoners. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) By way of this peon filed under Secon 2 read with Secon 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, read with Arcle 215 of the Constuon of India, peoners pray for iniang contempt proceedings against the respondents for violang the judgment and decree dated 24.09.2024 passed by this Court in RSA No.1447 of 1989. 2. On a specific query, learned counsel for the peoners concedes that execuon was filed for implementaon of the order passed by this Court and the order dated 05.05.2026 was passed by learned Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Gidderbaha (Annexure P-8), whereby the execuon was disposed of being fully sasfied. However learned counsel contends that despite making a statement by the respondents, the decree has not been complied with. 3. Having noced the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this Court is of the view that the present contempt peon is not maintainable. In case the decree has not been complied with, the peoners will be at liberty to get the execuon revived before the concerned Court or seek alternave remedy available to him in accordance with law. Disposed of accordingly. July 06, 2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SARITA RANI 2026.07.06 17:43 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order