Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26017 (PNJ)

PUNJAB AND SIND BANK v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND OTHERS

CWP/19732/2026 · 2026-07-03

Jasgurpreet Singh Puri, Sanjiv Berry

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 116 CWP-19732-2026 Date of Decision:- 03.07.2026 PUNJAB AND SIND BANK ....Petitioner(s) Versus DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND OTHERS ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present: Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocate, Mr. Teginder, Advocate for the petitioner. * * * * JASGURPREET SINGH PURI, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that the petition has become infructuous as the possession of the secured asset has been delivered. 2. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, petition stands disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (JASGURPREET SINGH PURI) JUDGE (SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 03.07.2026 S.Sharma i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No SANDAL SHARMA 2026.07.06 17:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment