219 MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OM PARKASH AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) CM-2619 days in filing the appeal same is allowed. LPA No.1063 of 2026 (O&M) 1. issue between the appellant and the respondent No.1 came up for consideration before this Court in Panchayat Vs. Prem Sagar ors.” Court on 01.07.2026. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-2619 LPA No.1063 of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THROUGH EXECUTIVE OFFICER VERSUS OM PARKASH AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Ms. Jasvir Kaur, Advocate for the applicant Mr. Harsh Chopra, Advocate for respondent No.1. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 2619-LPA-2026 Present application has been filed for condoning the delay of days in filing the appeal. Keeping in view the contents mentioned in the application allowed. Delay of 68 days in filing the appeal LPA No.1063 of 2026 (O&M) Learned counsel for the respondent No.1 submits that the same issue between the appellant and the respondent No.1 came up for consideration before this Court in LPA Panchayat Vs. Prem Sagar ors.”, which has already been dismis Court on 01.07.2026. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2619-2620-LPA-2026 in/and LPA No.1063 of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 02.07.2026 THROUGH EXECUTIVE OFFICER ........Appellant VERSUS ........Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL s. Jasvir Kaur, Advocate for the applicant-appellant. Mr. Harsh Chopra, Advocate for respondent No.1. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) been filed for condoning the delay of ts mentioned in the application, the 68 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Learned counsel for the respondent No.1 submits that the same issue between the appellant and the respondent No.1 came up for LPA No.1687 of 2026 titled “Nagar , which has already been dismissed by this been filed for condoning the delay of 68 , the Learned counsel for the respondent No.1 submits that the same issue between the appellant and the respondent No.1 came up for “Nagar sed by this SAPNA GOYAL 2026.07.06 12:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document LPA No.1063 of 2026 (O&M) -2- 2. Learned counsel for the appellant has not been able to dispute the said fact. 3. Keeping in view the agreement between the parties and in view of the detailed reasons mentioned in Nagar Panchayat’s case (supra), the present appeal is also dismissed in terms of findings recorded in Nagar Panchayat’s case (supra). 4. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE 02-07-2026 Sapna Goyal (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/ reasoned: YES Whether reportable: NO SAPNA GOYAL 2026.07.06 12:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document