Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:HHC:44121
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWPOA No. 745 of 2019
Date of decision: 09.10.2026. Naresh Kumar
...Petitioner.
Versus
State of H.P. & others
...Respondents.
Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Diwan Singh Negi, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Gautam Sood, Deputy Advocate General.
Ranjan Sharma, Judge:
Heard for some time.
2.
Considering the provision of Clause 5 of the Agreement dated 01.08.2011, Learned Counsel for petitioner does not intend to pursue the claim in present proceedings.
3.
Considering the above, instant proceedings are closed. As prayed, liberty is reserved for seeking redressal of surviving grievances, if any, hereafter, in accordance with law.
(Ranjan Sharma)
Judge 9th October, 2026. (kck)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the
judgment? Yes
-2-