1 APHC010599262016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 42533/2016 Between: Samireddy Nanibabu ...PETITIONER AND Andhra Pradesh Power Generation and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MALLIKARJUNA RAO P Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K.KRISHNABUSHAN CHOWDARY SC For APGENCO 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 42533 of 2016 Order:- This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the action of the Respondents herein in not appointing the Petitioner herein as Security Guard inspite of his physical fitness to the said post as certified by the Superintendent, King George Hospital, Visakhapatnam, and representations made by him Dated: 01-08-2016, 30- 08-2016 and 04-10-2016, is illegal, arbitrary, unjust, opposed to the Principles of Natural Justice and violative of the Fundamental Rights guaranteed by the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the Respondents herein to appoint the Petitioner herein to the post of Security Guard, and pass such other orders or order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” 2. On 02.01.2026, the learned Standing Counsel for APGENCO submitted that the very same petitioner had challenged the order dated 14.03.2016 passed by the respondent authorities by filing W.P. No. 3793 of 2020 before this Court, and that the same is still pending. Hence, the present writ petition is not maintainable. On that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3 Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption “for dismissal”. 3. Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not evincing any interest in prosecuting the matter. 4. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this writ petition shall stand closed. _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J 08.01.2026. ASR 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO.42533 of 2016 08.01.2026 ASR