AJAY JAIN ALIAS AJAY KUMAR JAIN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.M.P./2722/2026 · 2026-09-11
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26012 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26012 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:27489] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No.2722 of 2026
------ Ajay Jain @ Ajay Kumar Jain aged about 53 years, Son of Late Jugmander, Resident of 453/9, B.S.T. Road, Near Sita Automobiles, Gangaur, P.O. Ganaur, P.S. Ganaur, District- Sonipat, Haryana 131001.
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… Opposite Party.
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mrs. Vani Kumari, Advocate For the State
: Ms. Kumari Rashmi, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No:-03 Dated:-11-09-2026
Heard the parties.
This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer for restoration of Cr.M.P. No. 670 of 2024 to its original file which stood dismissed for default for non-compliance of the order dated 22.12.2025.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Cr.M.P. No. 670 of 2024 was dismissed for non-compliance of the order dated 22.12.2025. It is next submitted that Cr.M.P. No. 670 of 2024 was listed before this Bench on 22.12.2025 on which day, the petitioner was directed to deposit Rs.2,000/-, but the petitioner being ignorant of the order dated 22.12.2025, the said amount could not be deposited; which resulted in dismissal of this Cr.M.P. for non-compliance of the order dated
22.12.2025. It is further submitted that non-compliance of the learned counsel for the petitioner was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No. 670 of 2024 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the Cr.M.P. No. 670 of 2024 be restored to its original file.
Learned counsel for the State has not raised any serious objection to the prayer of the petitioner.
Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, Cr.M.P. No. 670 of 2024 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal.
Registry is directed to list Cr.M.P. No. 670 of 2024 before the appropriate Bench after a week.
This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of accordingly.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 11.09.2026 Amar/