Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2601 (CHH)

SATYA PRADEEP CHATTERJEE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/13497/2025 · 2026-04-05

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:15682 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 13497 of 2025 1. Satya Pradeep Chatterjee S/o Late Kripanidhan Chatterjee Aged About 61 Years Working As- Line Man, At- O/o The Executive Engineer, Urla Industrial Area, C S I D C , Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Dept. Of Commerce And Industries, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. The Managing Director Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation (C S I D C ) H. Q.- 1st Floor, Udyog Bhawan, Ring Road No. - 01, Telibandha, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Shri Pradeep Kaushik Junior Engineer, O/o The Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation (C S I D C) H. Q. - 1st Floor, Udyog Bhawan, Ring Road No. 01, Telibandha, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. R.K. Kesharwani, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Aditya Tiwari, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.2 : Mr. R.K. Gupta, Advocate For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Suyash Gupta, Advocate on behalf of Kashif Shakeel, Advocate SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Digitally signed by SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Date: 2026.04.06 19:57:08 +0530 2 S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 06/04/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “a. This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or suitable direction to the respondent no.02 for considering the name of the petitioner for promotion on the post of Sub-Engineer (Electrical) with all consequential benefits etc. b. This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to order for discontinue the services of the respondent no.3. c. This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow any other relief as the Hon’ble deemed fit and proper along with the cost of petition.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is working as Lineman under respondent No.2 and after completing requisite period of service as Lineman, he become eligible for consideration of his name for promotion to the post of Sub-Engineer (Electrical). However, on the post of Sub-Engineer (Electrical), respondent No.2 has posted respondent No.3 on contract basis, who is not having requisite qualification to hold said post i.e. Diploma in Electrical Engineering. Petitioner has submitted representation before respondent No.2 on 20.2.2025, 27.5.2025, which are pending consideration, therefore, direction may be issued to respondent No.2 to take decision 3 on pending representations of petitioner expeditiously within specified time. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respective respondents would submit that in view of limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, they are not having any objection. 4. Heard learned counsel for respective parties and perused the documents annexed along with writ petition. 5. Considering the facts and circumstance of case, nature of grievance raised in this writ petition and submission of learned counsel for respective parties, this writ petition at this stage is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to take decision on pending representations of petitioner dated 20.2.2025 and 27.2.2005, on its own merits, in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the order. 6. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge roshan/-