Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26008 (AP)

KADIYAM SWARNA LATHA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/31229/2024 · 2026-01-20

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010597602024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 31229/2024 Between: 1. KADIYAM SWARNA LATHA, W/O.RAMANJANEYULU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC. FP SHOP DEALER, FP SHOP NO.43, JYOTHI MAHILA PODUPU GROUP, R/O.D.NO.6-17-51, 17/3, ARUNDELPET, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP., BY ITS EX-OFFICIO SECRETARY, CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, AP STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD., D.NO.10-152/1, CIVIL SUPPLIES BHAVAN, 3RD FLOOR, SRI SAI TOWERS, BESIDE SIRIS COMPANY, KANURU, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, AP STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD., D.NO.10-152/1, CIVIL SUPPLIES BHAVAN, 3RD FLOOR, SRI SAI TOWERS, BESIDE SIRIS COMPANY, KANURU, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing G.O.Ms.No.10, dated 03-09-2024 and Circular, dated 15-09-2024, 27-09-2024 and 01-10-2024 without providing reservation to the Self Help Groups in G.O.Ms.No.32, dated 03-12-2018 and G.O.Ms.No.4, dated 19-11- 2011 is illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of natural justice, detrimental to the petitioners livelihood and violation of fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to set aside the G.O.Ms.No.10, dated 03-09-2024 and Circular, dated 15-09- 2024, 27-09-2024 and 01-10-2024 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the G.O.Ms.No.10, dated 03-09-2024 and Circulars, dated 15-09-2024, 27-09-2024 and 01-10-2024, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DAGGUBATI RAMASWAMY REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Sri D.R.S.Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous, however, sought liberty to take steps in necessity arises. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous giving liberty to petitioner to approach appropriate forum if necessity arises. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 21st January, 2026 RKS