APHC010596202025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3348/2025 Between: 1. SRI GOVINDARAJU VARI DHARMA INAM TRUST,, REP., BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE, SRI G. PRAVEEN KUMAR, S/O G. SRINIVAS RAO, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O D.NO.FF RESIDENCY, VIJAY NAGAR COLONY, BESIDE DON BOSCO PUBLIC SCHOOL, VIJAYAWADA 1. SRI VADAREVU VINAY CHAND IAS, FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI K RAMACHANDRA MOHAN, FATHERS NAME AND AG KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA. Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to call the contemnors herein and punish them under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of violating the order passed by this Hon 26.09.2024 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKAT SAILENDRA G Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU NAGURU IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3348/2025 SRI GOVINDARAJU VARI DHARMA INAM TRUST,, REP., BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE, SRI G. PRAVEEN KUMAR, S/O G. SRINIVAS RAO, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O D.NO.FF RESIDENCY, VIJAY NAGAR COLONY, BESIDE DON BOSCO PUBLIC SCHOOL, VIJAYAWADA-10. ...PETITIONER AND SRI VADAREVU VINAY CHAND IAS, FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. SRI K RAMACHANDRA MOHAN, FATHERS NAME AND AG KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to call the contemnors herein and punish them under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for willful disobedience and deliberately violating the order passed by this Hon’ble Court in WP No. 992 of 2022, dated Counsel for the Petitioner: VENKAT SAILENDRA G Counsel for the Contemnor(S): NAGARAJU NAGURU IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI SRI GOVINDARAJU VARI DHARMA INAM TRUST,, REP., BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE, SRI G. PRAVEEN KUMAR, S/O G. SRINIVAS RAO, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O D.NO.FF-1, SUJANA RESIDENCY, VIJAY NAGAR COLONY, BESIDE DON BOSCO ...PETITIONER SRI VADAREVU VINAY CHAND IAS, FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, SRI K RAMACHANDRA MOHAN, FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to call the contemnors herein and punish them under Sections 10 Courts Act for willful disobedience and deliberately ble Court in WP No. 992 of 2022, dated 2 The Court made the following order: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 26.09.2024 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.992 of 2022. 2. Sri G.Venkat Sailendra, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the respondent authorities have complied with the order dated 26.09.2024 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.992 of 2022, however with some delay. 3. To the said submission, Sri Nagaraju Naguru, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that due to administrative reasons, the said delay occurred and the same is neither willful nor wanton, as such, prayed to close the Contempt Case. 4. In view of the above, since the respondents have complied with the orders of this Court and also explained the delay satisfactorily, this Court is inclined to close the Contempt Case. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any in the Contempt Case, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 01.04.2026 MP 3 37 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO:3348 of 2025 Date: 01.04.2026 MP