AMBIKA SETHI AND OTHERS v. RAKESH KANWAR AND ANOTHER
COPC/1412/2026 · 2026-10-07
Sushil Kukreja
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26003 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26003 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:HHC:43559 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.1412 of 2026 Date of decision: 07.10.2026 Ambika Sethi & Ors. ….Petitioners Versus Rakesh Kanwar & another ….Respondents
Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Rocky, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on record communication dated 06.10.2026 along with copy of office order dated 05.10.2026, wherein, it has been stated that in compliance to this Court’s
judgment/order dated 13.05.2026, necessary orders have been passed by the Deputy Director of School Education, District Kangra vide speaking
order dated 05.10.2026.
2. Therefore, in view of the above, at this stage, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. However, the petitioners are at liberty to assail the aforesaid speaking order dated 05.10.2026, if they still remain aggrieved. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge October 07, 2026
(reena) 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement?