124 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA M/s S.S. Steel Industry Union of India and others CORAM: HON’BLE HON’BLE MR. Present: Mr. Amandeep Singh Talwar, Advocate for the petitioner. ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. 1. After some arguments in the matter and faced with the observation of the Court that disputed questions would require adjudication in the appeal, learned counsel for the petitioner comes up with a prayer to permit him to withdraw the writ petition with lib 2. In view of the above, the writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. 3. It goes without saying that if such an appeal is filed within two weeks from today, the same shall be decided on merits without delving upon the issue of limitation. 4. All pending misc. application(s), if any, also stand 02.07.2026 rajesh 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? 2. Whether reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18553 Date of Decision: 02.07.2026 M/s S.S. Steel Industry Vs. Union of India and others HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Mr. Amandeep Singh Talwar, Advocate for the petitioner. *** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Oral) After some arguments in the matter and faced with the observation of the Court that disputed questions would require adjudication in the appeal, learned counsel for the petitioner comes up with a prayer to permit him to withdraw the writ petition with lib In view of the above, the writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. It goes without saying that if such an appeal is filed within two weeks from today, the same shall be decided on merits without delving upon the issue of limitation. All pending misc. application(s), if any, also stand (ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? 2. Whether reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 18553-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.07.2026 …Petitioner …Respondents THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Mr. Amandeep Singh Talwar, Advocate for the petitioner. (Oral) After some arguments in the matter and faced with the observation of the Court that disputed questions would require adjudication in the appeal, learned counsel for the petitioner comes up with a prayer to permit him to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file statutory appeal. In view of the above, the writ petition is permitted to be It goes without saying that if such an appeal is filed within two weeks from today, the same shall be decided on merits without delving upon All pending misc. application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. SHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (ROHIT KAPOOR) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No After some arguments in the matter and faced with the observation of the Court that disputed questions would require adjudication in the appeal, learned counsel for the petitioner comes up with a prayer to In view of the above, the writ petition is permitted to be It goes without saying that if such an appeal is filed within two weeks from today, the same shall be decided on merits without delving upon RAJESH KUMAR 2026.07.06 17:00 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.