KHUMBIYA RAM v. H.P State Co Operative Agriculture and Rural Development Bank SHILLAI
CR.R/49/2026 · 2026-01-23
Rakesh Kainthla
Criminal Appealbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2599 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2599 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Revision No.49 of 2026 Date of Decision: 23.01.2026
Khumbiya Ram
...Petitioner Versus H.P. State Co-operative Agriculture & Rural Development Bank
...Respondent
Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Vacation Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner
: Mr. Vivek Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondent/State : Mr. Narender Singh Thakur,
Advocate (through video
conferencing)
Rakesh Kainthla, Vacation Judge
A receipt of Rs.6,101/-, being the 7.5% of the Cheque amount of Rs.81,339/-, has been filed, which is taken on record.
2.
Mr. Narender Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent-complainant, submits that the matter has been reconciled between the parties and the respondent-complainant does not intend to proceed with the matter further.
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
2
3.
In view of aforesaid, revision is allowed and the judgment of conviction dated 20.03.2023 and order of sentence dated 23.03.2023 passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Shillai, District Sirmaur, H.P., in Criminal Complaint No.29/3 of 2021, titled as H.P. State Co-operative Agriculture & Rural Development Bank Vs. Kumbiya Ram and affirmed by Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P., in Criminal Appeal No.45 of 2023, titled as Kumbiya Ram Vs. H.P. State Co-operative Agriculture & Rural Development Bank, decided on 05.05.2025, are ordered to be set aside and the complaint is dismissed as not pressed.
4.
It is stated that no money has been deposited before any Court, therefore, no order for disbursal of the amount is required to be passed.
5.
The petitioner is stated to be in judicial custody and he is presently lodged in Model Central Jail, Nahan, District Sirmaur, H.P. He is ordered to be released forthwith, if not required in any other case. Release warrants be prepared accordingly and the same be sent to the Superintendent, Model
3
Central Jail, Nahan, District Sirmaur, H.P., through FASTER forthwith for necessary compliance.
6.
In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
(Rakesh Kainthla) Vacation Judge 23rd January, 2026 (Rawat/Raturi) Digitally signed by GAURAV SINGH DN: C=IN, O=HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA, Phone=b615aae6b839bd7695619d205a06 49faa3f10ee78fd5fc7d356ef93266e0ead9, PostalCode=171001, S=Himachal Pradesh, SERIALNUMBER=97f5851e94d1ce4a9d9b 2419311e660ac9051e6298a507d8e42c11f e77a95002, CN=GAURAV SINGH Reason: I am the author of this document Location: Date: 2026-01-23 15:59:41 GAURAV SINGH