Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25964 (AP)

Smt.G.Venkata Subbamma v. Sri K.V.Ramana

CC/851/2015 · 2026-02-24

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010590902015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 851/2015 Between: 1. SMT. G.VENKATA SUBBAMMA,, W/O. G.NARAYANA YADAV, AGED ABOUT: 54 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE-WIFE, R/O. D.NO.44/6, CHENNUMIYAPETA, KADAPA TOWN, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI K V RAMANA, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KADAPA DISTRICT, KADAPA. 2. SRI CHALLA OBULESU, THE COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KADAPA. 3. SRI P SATYANARAYANA, THE KADAP CITY PLANNER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KADAPA. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NAGARAJU NAGURU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following: 2 ORAL ORDER: No representation on behalf of the Petitioner. 2. This Contempt Case is filed complaining of violation of the Interim Order passed by this Court dated 16.08.2013 in W.P.M.P.No.27216 of 2013 in W.P.No.22214 of 2013. 3. It transpires from record that the Writ Petition bearing W.P.No.22214 of 2013 is disposed of by a learned Single Judge of this Court vide Order dated 12.03.2024 holding that the cause does not survive due to afflux of time. 4. Since the main Writ Petition is disposed of, there is no cause of action in the present Contempt Case. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:25.02.2026 Vns