Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25963 (JHR)

SUSHIL TOPPO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/4432/2024 · 2026-09-11

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:27481 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 4432 of 2024 Sushil Toppo, aged about 44 years, son of Late Joseph Toppo, resident of Village-Bhusar, P.O.-Kamta, P.S.- Chandwa, District-Latehar ... Petitioner(s) Versus (1) The State of Jharkhand (2) The Secretary, Department of School Education and Literacy at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O.-Dhurwa, P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi -834004, Jharkhand. (3) The Director, Secondary Education Department of School Education and Literacy (Secondary Education Directorate) at Project Building Dhurwa, P.O.-Dhurwa, P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi -834004, Jharkhand. (4) The District Superintendent of Education Officer, Palamau, P.O. & P.S.-Daltonganj, District- Palamau, Jharkhand. (5) The District Superintendent of Education Officer, Latehar, P.O. & P.S. Latehar, (6) The District, Education officer, Latehar, PO & PS-Latehar, District- Latehar, Jharkhand (7) District Education Officer, Palamau, PO+PS-Daltonganj, District- Palamau, Jharkhand ... Respondent(s) -------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raj Vardhan, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Zaid Imam, AC to SC-VII -------- Order No. 5 /Dated: 11th September 2026 It has been informed by learned counsel for the petitioner that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. 2. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed as infructuous. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 11th September 2026 Amit Uploaded on 15/09/2026