Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25962 (AP)

SHAIK SHAKEELA v. SRI V VIJAY RAMA RAJU IAS

CC/3494/2025 · 2026-03-12

Nyapathy Vijay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010599702025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] FRIDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3494/2025 Between: 1. SHAIK SHAKEELA, D/O SHAIK NAZEER AHEMMED AGED 28 YEARS OCC. STUDENT R/O DR. NO. 13-197, BC COLONY PANYAM KURNOOL ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI V VIJAY RAMA RAJU IAS, COMMISSIONER OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, O/O SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT VENKATADRI TOWERS, ATMAKUR (M) MANGALAGIRI GUNTUR 2. SMT S BHARANI I F S, VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR THE SPORTS AUTHORITY OF ANDHRA PRADESH IGMC STADIUM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents herein under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act for willfully violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court in WP.No.25463 / 2025 dated 18.09.2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PAMARTHY RATHNAKAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO 2. RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM The Court made the following: 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY Contempt Case No.3494 of 2025 ORDER: 1. The present Contempt Case is filed for non-compliance of the Interim Order, dated 18.09.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.25463 of 2025. 2. Learned counsel for Respondent No.2 passed on order copy and submitted that the Interim Order passed by this Court was complied with and Joint Director, O/o. Director of School Education, Amaravathi vide its orders in Rc.No.ESE02-20021/162/2025-RECTMT-CSE, dated 12.12.2025, rejected the case of the Petitioner. 3. In that view, the Contempt Case is closed, leaving it open to the Petitioner to challenge the correctness of the orders referred above. 4. No order as to costs. 5. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. Order copy was placed on record. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 13.03.2026 chs 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY 124 Contempt Case No.3494 of 2025 Date: 13.03.2026 chs