- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33432 RSA No. 836 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 836 OF 2010 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. THYARNALLEPPA, S/O KEMPEGOWDA, AGED MAJOR, HALEPALYA GRAMA, DINNAHALLI POST, MASTI HOBLI, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563130. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. K.H. SOMASHEKHARA AND SMT. G.M.SUMITHRA, ADVOCATES – ABSENT) AND: 1. SRI. DODDAYELAPPA, S/O KEMPEGOWDA, AGED MAJOR, R/O. HALEPALYA VILLAGE, TEKAL HOBLI, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563130. 2. SRI. BATHEPPA, S/O KEMPEGOWDA, AGED MAJOR, R/O. HALEPALYA VILLAGE, TEKAL HOBLI, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563130. Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33432 RSA No. 836 of 2010 3. SRI. RAMAKRISHNAPPA, S/O KEMPEGOWDA, AGED MAJOR, R/O. HULADENAHALLI, TEKAL HOBLI, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563130. …RESPONDENTS (R2 AND R3 SERVED, VIDE ORDER DATED 13.04.2023, APPEAL AGAINST R1 STANDS DISMISSED AS ABATED) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.05.2007 PASSED IN R.A.NO.190/2002 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (SR. DN.), KOLAR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29.06.2002 PASSED IN O.S.NO.321/1996 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR. DN.), MALUR. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL JUDGMENT This appeal is pending from the year 2010. On 13.04.2023, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. When the matter was listed before the Court on 07.06.2023, it was ordered to list the matter after two weeks, as prayed. On 29.04.2026, again none appeared for the appellant and today also there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Inspite of this matter is of the year 2010, the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33432 RSA No. 836 of 2010 appellant is not pursuing the matter diligently. Even when the matter is called at 4.30 p.m., there is no representation for the appellant. It appears that the appellant has lost his interest in pursuing the matter. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 67