Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25955 (AP)

G. Rukminamma v. The Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Board

WP/28824/2009 · 2026-01-04

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010599122009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 28824/2009 Between: 1. G. RUKMINAMMA, W/O. LATE G. SUBBIRAMI REDDY HOUSEWIFE R/O. KOTHURU, INDUKURPET MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE WAKF BOARD, OPP. PUBLIC GARDENS, HAJ HOUSE COMPLEX, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD, REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. C V R RUDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent: 1. SHAIK KHAJA BASHA The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri T.B.L. Murthy, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri C.V.R. Rudra Prasad, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri M. Sohail Shareef, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Shaik Khaja Basha, learned Standing Counsel for Waqf Board. 2. Sri T.B.L. Murthy, learned Counsel appearing for the Writ Petitioner, once again seeks time for bringing on record the nominee instead of the legal 2 representatives. The docket would indicate that such opportunity was granted on 03.12.2025, 09.12.2025, 12.12.2025 and 19.12.2025. Despite so many opportunities having been granted, the needful has not been done so far. 3. In this view of the matter, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:05.01.2026 Vns