IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 181 CR-4333-2026 Date of decision: 06.07.2026 Kanwar Abhishek . . . . Petitioner Vs. Rajiv Chaudhary . . . . Respondent **** CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA **** Present: - Mr.Sanjeev Patiyal, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Ejectment petition filed by the petitioner was decided on 29.07.2023 by learned Rent Controller, Panchkula ordering the ejectment of the respondent from the demised premises. The respondent filed an appeal wherein the petitioner herein moved an application for directing the appellant-respondent herein to pay mesne profit for unauthorised use and occupation of the premises. 2. Learned counsel submits that though the appellate authority has granted stay against the ejectment order but has not disposed of the application for directing the respondent to pay the mesne profit. 3. In the present petition, petitioner has assailed the order dated 05.04.2025, whereby stay was granted. 4. However, during arguments, learned counsel submits that he will be satisfied in case learned appellate authority is directed to dispose of the appeal or at least the application for directing the respondent to make the payment of mesne profit. 5. Without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is hereby disposed of by directing the concerned appellate authority to dispose of the application for directing the respondent to pay the mesne profits, on its own merit, within next one month positively. Appellate Authority shall also make genuine endeavour to dispose of the appeal expeditiously. (DEEPAK GUPTA) 06.07.2026 JUDGE Vivek Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable VIVEK PAHWA 2026.07.06 18:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document