- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33266 WP No. 25136 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 25136 OF 2024 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: M/S. NIHARIKA TRADING CORPORATION, PROPRIETARY FIRM, PROP- MR.KIRAN KUMAR S., (AGE-47) S/O. N.SAMPATH KUMAR, NO.9, FLAT NO.F1, 3RD CROSS, 1ST 'R' BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560010. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RUDRABHUSHAN C.B., ADVOCATE) [ABSENT] AND: THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, UNION BANK OF INDIA A PUBLIC SECTOR BANK REGISTERED AS A LIMITED COMPANY HAVING OFFICE AT NO.594, SHRI KAALI COMPLEX, GROUND FLOOR, 1ST MAIN ROAD, 2ND BLOCK, DR.RAJKUMAR ROAD, BENGALURU-560010. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. RAKESH M.P., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. NAGARAJ N.DAMODAR, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33266 WP No. 25136 of 2024 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. Sri.Rakesh.M.P., counsel on behalf of Sri.Nagaraj.N.Damodar., for the respondent has appeared in person. 2. This petition is filed seeking following reliefs: a) Issue a writ of certiorari and quash the impugned Demand Notice dated:02.08.2024 vide Annexure-A in so far as petitioner is concerned. b) Pass any such order or direction as deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity. 3. Counsel for the respondent submits that a memo has been filed for disposal of the writ petition. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33266 WP No. 25136 of 2024 Counsel further submits that the petitioner has questioned the demand notice dated 02.08.2024. However, the same has been withdrawn by the Bank. Counsel, therefore, submits that nothing survives for consideration in the present writ petition. Memo is placed on record. Taking note of the submission that the demand notice has been withdrawn by the Bank, nothing survives for consideration in the present writ petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33