1 APHC010596472025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 31768/2025 Between: 1. MERIGA VIJAYA JYOTHI, W/O. M. MOHAN RAO, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, RESIDENT OF THULLURU VILLAGE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 2. THE REGIONAL COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, 341, BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAVAN, BANDRA-IV, BANDRA EAST (S.O.), MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA STATE 3. SMT N M DEEPIKA, FLAT NO.501, SRI SALASAR GARDENIA, GEDIMETLA VILLAGE, SPRING FIELD COLONY, CYBERABAD. R3 IS SUO-MOTO IMPLEADED AS PER THE COURT'S ORDER DT.05.12.2025 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B PARAMESEWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DIVYA DATLA 2. ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI 2 The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri M. Mohan Rao, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri B. Parameswara Rao, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Ms. Divya Datla, learned Counsel for the Respondent No.1 and Sri Anup Koushik Karavadi, learned Counsel for the Respondent No.2. 2. Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, in response to the Order of this Court dated 23.12.2025, would submit that despite his best efforts, he has not been able to obtain any particulars regarding the contact address of the daughter-in-law. 3. Since the amount that is due to the Writ Petitioner herein has already been disbursed by Respondent No.2, the grievance of the Writ Petitioner stands redressed, and no cause survives for further consideration. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:05.01.2026 Vns