Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25950 (AP)

Madiga Eranna v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh

WP/32202/2013 · 2026-03-11

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HN, J W.P.No.32202_2013 APHC010591792013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 32202/2013 Between: 1. MADIGA ERANNA,, S/O. M.PAPANNA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC: FIELD ASSISTANT, R/O. PULAKURTHI VILLAGE, KODUMURU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, RURAL DEVELOPMENT, OFFICE AT H.NO.5-10- 192, 2ND AND 5TH FLOORS, HUDA HERMITAGE OFFICE COMPLEX, HILL FORT ROAD, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 3. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR/ADDITIONAL DPC, NREGS, DWMA, KURNOOL 4. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, MANDAL PRAJA PARISHAD, KODUMURU, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. THE ASSISTANT PROJECT DIRECTOR DWMA, PATTIKONDA, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the final orders vide Notice No. 33/DVC/Social 2 HN, J W.P.No.32202_2013 Audit/2012, Dated: 16.07.2012 of the 3rd respondent in terminating the petitioner from the post of Field Assistant by concluding the enquiry without any evidence and reasons recored as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 40053 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the final orders vide Notice No. 33/DVC/Social Audit/2012, Dated: 16.07.2012 of the 3rd respondent, pending disposal of the above Writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K V RAGHU VEER Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I 3 HN, J W.P.No.32202_2013 ORDER: 1. The petitioner has challenged the impugned proceedings passed by the Project Director. As per the impugned proceedings, an appeal lies before the District Collector within the time specified therein. 2. However, the petitioner has approached this Court without filing an appeal before the appellate authority. 3. In view of the above, this Court finds no grounds to interfere in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:12.03.2026 NKA 4 HN, J W.P.No.32202_2013 20 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 32202 of 2013 Date: 12.03.2026 NKA