Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25946 (AP)

SHAIK ROSHINI v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/30918/2024 · 2026-03-04

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010590552024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 30918/2024 Between: 1. SHAIK ROSHINI, W/O (LATE) KASIM, AGED 38 YRS , OCC. FP SHOP DEALER FOR SHOP NO.0601030 , BUDAVADA VILLAGE, JAGGAIAHPETA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT), SECRETARAIT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NANDIGAAMA. 3. THE DISTRICT COLELCTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE COLLECTOR CS, KRISHNA 5. THE SUB COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particulalry one in the Nature of Writ of Certiorari to Call for the records pertaining to the Impugned Notification dt.25-11- 2024 issued by the 2nd respondent for appointment of a Permanent Ration Dealer for F.P.Shop No.0601030 Budavada Vilalge, Jaggaiahpeta Mandal without 2 mentioning the Petitioners name as she is running the said F.P.Shop No.0601030 on a Temporary Basis since 2020 as per the proceedings of 4th Respondent Vide RC.D2/80- 0601030/2019 Dt 28.02.2020 until further orders and without terminating the said order alloting to third parties is Contrary to the Notification, all are Illegal, Unlawful, Violaiton of Principles of Natural Justice, Violaiton of Article 14,19,21 of the Constitution of India , Violation of A.P.,State Public Distribution System Control order Consequently to Set-Aside the Impugned Notification Nandigama Dt.25.11.2024 in respect of F.P.Shop No.0601030 there by to direct the respondents to Continue the petitioner as fair price shop dealer for her F.P. shop No.060130 as permanent dealer by regularizing the petitoners authorization in the interest of the jsutice. and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to STAY of the Impugned Notification issued by the 2nd respondent i.e., Nandigama Dt.25.11.2024 for F.P.Shop No.0601030 of Budavada Vilalge, Jaggaiahpeta Mandal pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased be Pleased to dispense with filing the original copy of impugned proceedings (EX-P-1) in the interest of the justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAVURI LEELA SAI SAMPATH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Sri Ravuri Leela Sai Sampath, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous, however, sought liberty to approach appropriate authority. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous giving liberty to the petitioner to approach appropriate authority in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 05th March, 2026 RKS