144 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-34981-2026 Date of Decision:06.07.2026 Amarjit Kaur …Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. C. L Pawar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.S. Bajwa, DAG, Punjab. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S with a prayer to issue appropriate directions to respondent No.5 not to harass the petitioner by calling her unnecessarily at Police Station Behram in respect of complaint made by respondents No.6 and 7. A further prayer has been made to restrain the respondent No.5 from conducting multiple enquiries on the same set of allegations. 2. Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Gurdip Singh submits that complaints were received from respondents No.6 and 7 and after enquiry, the matter has been closed. He further submits that even the petitioner is not appearing before the police, despite repeated notices and till date, no substance has been found in the complaint submitted by her and her representation shall be closed by tomorrow. HITESH 2026.07.06 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh CRM-M-34981-2026 -2 3. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, no further orders are required to be passed by this Court and the petition is accordingly, disposed of. 4. Needless to observe that both the parties shall be at liberty to avail their alternative legal remedies, if any, in accordance with law. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 06.07.2026 JUDGE hitesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HITESH 2026.07.06 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh