Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 / 2
CGHC010247242026
2026:CGHC:28862
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5052 of 2026 Smt. Ramkumari W/o Shri Surendra Yadav Aged About 40 Years By Caste Yadav, R/o Village Jamunpani, Parewa-Chhapar, Tahsil Kukdur, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Director Of Women And Child Welfare Department Indrawati Bhawan, Second Floor, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
2. The Collector Office Of The Collectorate Kabirdham, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh
3. The Project Officer Integrated Child Development Projects, Kukdur, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh
4. The Chief Executive Officer Office Of The Chief Executive, Pandariya, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh
5. The Block Development Officer Office Of The B D O, Block Pandariya, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh
6. The Block Education Officer Office Of The Block B E O, Block Pandariya, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh
7. Smt Priyanka W/o Shri Dilharan Aged About 34 Years By Caste Gond, R/o Village Jamunpani, Parewa-Chhapar, Tahsil Kukdur, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Shri Santosh Bharat, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Shri S.S. Badgaiya, G.A. JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2026.07.10 17:55:23 +0530
2 / 2 (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 10/07/2026
1. At the outset, learned State counsel submits that the present writ petition questions the appointment of respondent No. 7 to the post of Aanganbadi Karyakarta in Block Pandariya, District Kabirdham. He further submits that the writ petition is not maintainable in view of the efficacious statutory remedy of appeal available under Clause 11 of the Aanganbadi Karyakarta Niyukti Nirdesh, 2008. According to him, the petitioner may avail the said remedy by preferring an appeal before the Collector, which shall be considered and decided in accordance with law.
2. In view of the aforesaid objection, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to avail the statutory remedy of appeal before the competent appellate authority under the provisions of the Aanganbadi Karyakarta Niyukti Nirdesh, 2008.
3. Prayer is allowed.
4. Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU)
JUDGE Jyoti