Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25934 (AP)

Smt R.Deviramma, W/o Satyappa v. The Tahsildar

WP/17905/2013 · 2026-03-10

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HN, J W.P.No.17905_2013 APHC010597842013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 17905/2013 Between: 1. SMT R.DEVIRAMMA, W/O SATYAPPA, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, RESIDING AT PERUGUPALYAM VILLAGE, SETTUR MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE TAHSILDAR, SETTUR, SETTUR MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 2. MANDAL EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, SETTUR MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 1st respondent in removing the petitioner from the post of worker of Midday Meal Agency at Elementary School, Perugupalyam Village, Settur Mandal, Anantapur District, without giving any notice or intimation, as illegal, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice and consequently quash the proceedings dated 22.04.2013 issued by the 1st respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 21808 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent to continue the petitioner as worker of Midday Meal Agency at Elementary School, Perugupalyam Village, Settur Mandal, Anantapur District pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SESHADRI GOALLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR EDUCATION 2. GP FOR REVENUE 2 HN, J W.P.No.17905_2013 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause of action in this writ petition does not survive any further for adjudication and became infructuous. 2. Recording the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:11.03.2026 NKA 3 HN, J W.P.No.17905_2013 74 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 17905 of 2013 Date: 11.03.2026 NKA