JAGJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/7834/2026 · 2026-07-06
Manisha Batra
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25931 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25931 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-7834-2026 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
129
CRWP-7834-2026
Date of decision: 6th July, 2026
Jagjit Singh and another ...Petitioners Versus
State of Punjab and others ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA
Present: Mr. Sukhmeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. DAG, Punjab.
***
MANISHA BATRA, J (ORAL):-
The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of the private respondents No. 4 to 8 and to take action on their representation dated 02.07.2026 (Annexure P-3).
2.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that they are major. They are in love. Their parents are against their relationship and threats have even been extended to petitioner No.2 by her parents and relatives to kill her. She has left her house and has started living with the petitioner No.1. Apprehending danger to their lives and liberty, they sent representation dated 02.07.2026 (Annexure P-3) to the respondent No. 2- Senior PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.07.06 16:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-7834-2026 -2-
Superintendent of Police, Ferozepur but the same has not been taken into
consideration and hence, the present petition.
3.
Notice of motion.
4.
Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. DAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents, at this stage. The petitioners’ counsel is directed to supply the copy of the petition to her.
5.
This Court has heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned State counsel and without going into the question of legality of their relationship as well as without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the veracity of the averments made in the petition and also with regard to the sanctity of relationship or age of the petitioners, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Ferozepur to look into the matter and dispose of the representation dated 02.07.2026(Annexure P-3) in accordance with law and also to take necessary step, if any genuine threat to life and liberty of the petitioners is found.
6.
It is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them.
[MANISHA BATRA]
JUDGE 6th July, 2026 Parveen Sharma
1. Whether speaking/ reasoned
: Yes / No
2. Whether reportable
: Yes / No PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.07.06 16:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document