1 CWP-19878 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19878 of 2026 Date of decision: 06.07.2026 Amarjit Singh alias Amarjit Singh Brar ….Petitioner versus The Punjab State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Federation Limited and others ….Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate, and Mr. Lovedev Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. T.S. Sidhu, Advocate, for the respondents. NAMIT KUMAR , J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to release and disburse to the petitioner all his lawful retiral and consequential service benefits, including leave encashment, refund of security amount, arrears of salary arising out of revision of pay scales, refund of the amounts illegally deducted from his salary pursuant to the punishment orders subsequently set aside, incentive of wheat in terms of the policy of RAVINDER SINGH 2026.07.06 18:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment 2 CWP-19878 of 2026 MARKFED, and all other admissible dues along with interest @ 18% per annum from the date each amount became due till the date of its actual realization. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of his grievances, petitioner has moved representation dated 03.05.2018 (Annexure P-13) to the respondents, which is still pending consideration. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be given liberty to supplement the said representation by filing a fresh representation and the same may be considered and disposed of by respondent No.3 in a time-bound manner. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. T.S. Sidhu, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and has no objection to the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record of the case. 6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case or the claim being made by the petitioner in the present petition, respondent No.3 is directed to consider and decide the claim made in the representation dated 03.05.2018 (Annexure P-13) and supplementary representation, if any moved by the petitioner within a period of two weeks, in accordance with law, by passing a speaking order, after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a RAVINDER SINGH 2026.07.06 18:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment 3 CWP-19878 of 2026 period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. 7. The petition stands disposed of. 06.07.2026 (NAMIT KUMAR) R.S. JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2026.07.06 18:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment