Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25923 (HP)

RANJITA DEVI v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/17364/2026 · 2026-10-06

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.17364 of 2026 Decided on: 6th October, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ranjita Devi …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and another .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Bhanu Verma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Sikander Bhushan, Deputy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Sikander Bhushan, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioner seeks applicability of Mohinder Singh & Others Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others2. It is, however, seen from the record that the petitioner has not preferred any representation for the redressal of her grievances raised in the writ petition. 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 CWP No.3493 of 2025, decided on 10.08.2026 2 3. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring a representation within two weeks from today. In case such a representation is so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua October 06, 2026 Judge Mukesh