Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25916 (JHR)

DAVID KACHHAP v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

W.P.(Cr.)/493/2026 · 2026-09-11

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, Sujit Narayan Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:27501-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (HB)(Cr.)(DB) No. 493 of 2026 ------ David Kachhap aged about 62 years son of Late Lawrence Kachhap resident of Naya Toli Pandra P.O. Hehal, P.S. Sukhdevnagar (Pandra O.P.) District Ranchi 834005 Aadhar No. xxxx-xxxx-xxxx Mob. 76777***** … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Officer In-charge P.S. Pandra District Ranchi 3. Dr. Rev Roshan Massih, aged about 42 yrs S/o not known, C/o Vishwambhar Digambar Shelake, Shelka layout, ward no. 1, ta mehkar, Vivekanand Nagar, Buldhana, Maharashtra PIN 443301 … Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Sharan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shubham Gautam, AC to Sr. AAG ------ 03/Dated: 11th September, 2026 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the prayer made in the instant petition is having no force as of now, as such, he does not intend to press the same. 2. Such submission has been made by the learned counsel on the instruction received from his client. 3. The aforesaid submissions have been made in the presence of learned State counsel. 4. Learned counsel representing the State has submitted that the corpus has been recovered and she herself has returned to her house. 2026:JHHC:27501-DB 5. Considering the prayer so made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition being W.P.(HB)(Cr.)(DB) No. 493 of 2026 is dismissed as not pressed, and as such, disposed of. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) 11th September, 2026 Samarth Uploaded on 15.09.2026