1 CGHC010218422026 2026:CGHC:28660 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 5128 of 2026 • Amandeep Singh S/o Gurmeet Singh Aged About 28 Years R/o Sondongri Balaji Green City Kabir Nagar Raipur Tehsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant(s) versus • State of Chhattisgarh Through- Police Station Mandir Hasaud, Raipur District Raipur C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Applicant(s) : Mr. Raza Ali, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Ms. Vaishali Mahilong, Dy.G.A Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 09.07.2025 1. The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail, as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 148/2026, registered at Police Station – Mandir Hasaud, District – Raipur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 61(2), 317(2), 112 and 182A(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS). 2. The case of the prosecution, is that complainant company has got the order for the supply of TMT Sariya Iron Bar from the M/s Shriji Kripa VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Digitally signed by VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Date: 2026.07.10 18:46:44 +0530 2 Project Ltd and for which complainant has transported the said TMT Bar through four trailer and out of that four trailer 2 trailors reached to the site on dated 08.03.2026 and 09.03.2026 and found correct weight and thereafter the another trailor bearing no. CG 04 JC 6215 reached the site on 10.03.2026 and on weight 5 Metric Tone of TMT was deficient and one another trailer bearing no. CG04 MS 9932 reached the site on 17.03.2026 and in this triler also there is deficient of 5 Metric ToneIron bar was found and on inspection it was found that inner side of trailer one box was made in which pig iron of the same weight was filled up to show that weight of correct and based on the aforesaid allegations, the police registered the offence against the applicant, hence, this bail application. 3. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case and there is no criminal antecedents registered against the present applicant. It is further submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed in this case. The applicant is in jail since 22.03.2026 and trial is likely to take quite long time for its conclusion, therefore, he prays for grant of bail. 4. On the other hand, the learned State counsel opposes the bail application and submits that there is no criminal antecedents registered against the present applicant, and the charge-sheet has been filed in this case. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused all of the documents available on record. 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of allegation levelled against the applicant and the 3 fact that there is no any criminal antecedents registered against the present applicant, charge-sheet has been filed against the applicant, the applicant is in jail since 22.03.2026 and conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time, I am inclined to allow this application. 7. Let applicant, Amandeep Singh, involved in Crime No. 148/2026, registered at Police Station – Mandir Hasaud, District – Raipur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 61(2), 317(2), 112 and 182A(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS), be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening 4 of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 8. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Vaishali