1 CGHC010343572018 2026:CGHC:28935 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 1820 of 2018 1 - Shriram General Insurance Company Limited 4th Floor, Maruti Heights, Near R.K. Mall, G.E. Road, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Another Address- Branch Office, E-8, Ricco Industrial Area, Sitapur, Jaipur, Rajasthan, (Insurer Of Tanker No. C.G.04/jc/3121), District : Jaipur, Rajasthan. ... Appellant versus 1 - Smt. Meena Mahant Wd/o Late Virendra Das Mahant, Aged About 35 Years, Minor Represented Through Their Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Meena Mahant W/o Late Virendra Das Mahant, Aged About 35 Years, R/o- Chhoti Koni, Thana Koni, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Aman Kumar S/o Late Virendra Das Mahant, Aged About 12 Years, Minor Represented Through Their Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Meena Mahant W/o Late Virendra Das Mahant, Aged About 35 Years, R/o- Chhoti Koni, Thana Koni, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Pallavi Mahant D/o Late Virendra Das Mahant, Aged About 10 Years, Minor Represented Through Their Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Meena Mahant W/o Late Virendra Das Mahant, Aged About 35 Years, R/o- Chhoti Koni, Thana Koni, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Gambir Das Mahant S/o Sukhdas Mahant, Aged About 57 Years, R/o- Chhoti Koni, Thana Koni, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Smt. Suraj Bai W/o Gambhir Das Mahant, Aged About 53 Years, R/o- Chhoti Koni, Thana Koni, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Dilip Kumar S/o Mityanand, Aged About 63 Years, R/o- Mathpurena, Ward No. 09, Thana- Aamanaka, Raipur, District- SOURABH PATEL Digitally signed by SOURABH PATEL Date: 2026.07.10 16:32:59 +0530 2 Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Present Address- Jaihind Garage, Ram Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 7 - Rambabu Rai S/o Ganga Prasad Rai R/o- Ganpat Chowk, Heerapur, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Appellant : None. For Respondents : None. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 10/07/2026 1. Today, none appears on behalf of the appellant even when the case is called in the second round. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the present appeal. 2. In the absence of any representation on behalf of the appellant, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/-Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge $ourabh