IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.17631 of 2026 Date of Decision: 05.10.2026 _______________________________________________________ Ms. Thinley Dechen …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondent- State. Mr. Vijay Bragta, Joint Director present in person. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioner fairly states that on account of subsequent development, present petition has been rendered infructuous and same may be disposed of, reserving liberty to the petitioner to raise similar issue in another petition at the relevant time, if required and desired. Ordered accordingly. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge October 05,2026 (shankar) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?