KAUSTUB SARKAR, REPRESENTED THROUGH HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, NAMELY, SANDEEP KUMAR GUPTA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
WPC/7237/2026 · 2026-09-14
Sri Ananda Sen
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25892 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25892 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:27577 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P(C) No. 7237 of 2026
Kaustab Sarkar, S/o Late Ramprasad Sarkar, R/o Katchori Gali, Lahori Tola, PO + PS Bhelpur, District Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh Represented through his Power of Attorney Holder, namely, Sandeep Kumar Gupta, S/o Late Ganga Sagar, R/o Quarter No.63, Road No.2, Jamshedpur, Sakin Kadma Farm, PO + PS Kadma, District East Singhbhum
.... Petitioner(s).
Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Deputy Commissioner, Giridih 3.Additional Collector, Giridih 4.Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Giridih 5.District Sub- Registrar, Giridih 6.Circle Officer, Giridih 7.Azadul Haque, S/o Late Abdul Motalib, R/o House No.106, Ward No.06, Khalasi Mohalla, Madhupur, PO + PS Madhupur, District Giridh 8.Ravindra Sharma, S/o Naragmal Tungariya, R/o Jain Colony, College Road, Madhupur, PO + PS Madhupur, District Giridih 9.Gunwant Singh Mongia, S/o Late Daljit Singh Saluja, R/o Netaji Chowk, Bhandaridih, Giridih, PO + PS Giridih, District Giridih
… Respondent(s).
……
CORAM :
SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Kr. Gupta, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Ashok Kumar, AAG-IV For the Resp Nos.7-9 : Mr. R.N. Sahay, Sr. Advocate
Mr. Yashvardhan, Advocate
Mr. Kirtivardhan, Advocate
…......
02/ 14.09.2026: Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
2. Petitioner is claiming right, title and interest over the property in question, which is subject matter of this writ petition.
3. In this writ petition, petitioner has prayed for setting aside at Annexure-6, which is a report dated 10.12.2021 forwarded to the Deputy Commissioner.
4. It is grievance of the petitioner that respondents have entered into the question of right, title and interest of the property in question which ought not have been done as the Revenue Authorities have no
power to adjudicate or decide in right, title and interest.
5. Be that as it may, after going through the record, I find that the petitioner is claiming right, title and interest over the property in question. To declare the right, title and interest over the property, evidence has to be produced which needs to be considered by appropriate Civil Court.
6. Thus, I direct the petitioner to approach the appropriate Civil Court for redressal of his grievance.
7. If any application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 is filed, the same will be considered expeditiously by the Trial Court.
8. With the aforesaid observation, the instant writ petition stands
disposed of.
9. I.A. No.13028 of 2026 also stands disposed of.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) 14th September, 2026 R.S./ Uploaded on 15/09/2026