Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25890 (AP)

Lekkala Venkateswara Rao v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh

WP/11575/2014 · 2026-03-17

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010593962014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 11575/2014 Between: 1. LEKKALA VENKATESWARA RAO,, S/O. L.V.S. CHOWDARY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC: RAILWAY EMPLOYEES, SECUNDERABAD. PERMANENT ADDRESS 12-331-A/9-C, HARIHARANAGAR, ANANTAPURAM TOWN, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, ANANTAPURAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. 4. LINGALA PEDDI REDDY, S/O. L. SUNKI REDDY, AGE 52 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO.6-2-971, OPP: VENKATESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE, RAMNAGAR, ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. 5. YERRAGUNTLA PADMAVATHI, W/O. Y. JANARDHANA REDDY, AGE 42 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, D.NO.13/1/851, REVENUE COLONY, ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. 6. DEVARAPALLI BHARATHI, W/O. N. GANGI REDDY, AGE 40 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, R/O. D.NO.13/1/851, REVENUE COLONY, ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC FOR M.CORPORATION IN RAYALASEEMA REGION IN 2. GP FOR HOME 3. MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM 4. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV 5. T BHEEMANNA(S C FOR MUN CORP ATP) The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Sri G. Sai Kiran, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri K. Srinivas, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, submits that this case has become infructuous. 2. Having so recorded, the Writ Petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. 3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. _________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 18.03.2026 DSV 127 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 11575/2014 18.03.2026 DSV HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No. WRIT PETITION NO: 11575/2014 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No DATE ORDER Office Note 02. 18.03.2026 GRKP, J Writ Petition is disposed of as Infructuous. (vide separate order) ___________ GRKP, J DSV