Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2589 (CAL)

MANOJ KUMAR SHUKLA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (NDPS)/1231/2025 · 2026-02-02

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

02.02.2026 Court No.35. M/L. 24. Kausik (Rejected) CRM (NDPS) 1231 of 2025 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Gaighata Police Station Case No. 778 of 2024 dated 28.08.2024 under Sections 21(C)/25/28/29 of the NDPS Act, 1985. And In the matter of : Manoj Kumar Shukla ……Petitioner. Mr. Debasish Kar Mr. Arka Tilak Bhadre Mr. Hussain Mustafa Ms. S. Perveen Ms. Paramita Mukherjee ……for the Petitioner. Mr. Joydeep Roy, Jr. Govt. Adv. Mr. Duttatreya Dutta ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for a considerable period of time and there has been no progress and the petitioner has been implicated on the basis of statement of co-accused. On the other hand learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the Hon’ble Supreme Court has granted time for concluding the trial within a year. So far as the present petitioner is concerned, it has been pointed out by the State that CDR was sent after extracting and/or retrieving the data from the mobile phone and the same has matched according to the report. 2 Having considered the complicity of the present petitioner, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, CRM (NDPS) 1231 of 2025 is dismissed. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)