IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42005 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2026 Thana- MADANPUR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Roushan @ Raushan Kumar @ Boss yadav @ Boss Son of Chhotu Lal Yadav @ Chhotu Yadav @ Chhotu Resident of Village -Tenduaa pokhar PS- Muffasil (But in FIR Ps Has wrongly stated as madanpur), District -Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Rupa Kumari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Abhay Kumar Roy, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 09-07-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 05 of 2026, registered for offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is alleged to be involved in the trade of illicit liquor. It has also been alleged that stolen scorpio (vehicle) was recovered from the possession of the petitioner and he was using the same vehicle for trading the illicit liquor. The name of the petitioner has surfaced in the self-inculpatory statement of a co-accused. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42005 of 2026(2) dt.09-07-2026 2/2 p petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. 5. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the allegations levelled against the petitioner and the fact that the petitioner has six criminal antecedents, in the opinion of this Court, this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. 7. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is hereby dismissed. 8. The petitioner may surrender in the Court below and pray for regular bail. 9. It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the proceedings. pallavi/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T